Lovick v. City of Marion
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant contends that the duty of a municipal corporation under R. C. 723.01,1 to keep its streets “open, in repair, and free from nuisance,” includes not only the street itself, but also a catch basin and sloping drain adjacent thereto.
Since 1852, the principle embodied in R. C. 723.01 has been a part of Ohio law (50 Ohio Laws 244, Section 63). As its object, inter alia, R. C. 723.01 places an obligation on a municipality to keep highways and streets open fur the purposes for which they were designed and built, i. e., to afford the public a safe means of travel. Fankhauser v. Mansfield…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Yackee v. Village of NapoleonOhio Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ruwe v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Dickerhoof v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
- Williamson v. PavlovichOhio Supreme Court · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.