Legal Opinion

Lovick v. City of Marion

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1975No. 74-883PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant contends that the duty of a municipal corporation under R. C. 723.01,1 to keep its streets “open, in repair, and free from nuisance,” includes not only the street itself, but also a catch basin and sloping drain adjacent thereto.

Since 1852, the principle embodied in R. C. 723.01 has been a part of Ohio law (50 Ohio Laws 244, Section 63). As its object, inter alia, R. C. 723.01 places an obligation on a municipality to keep highways and streets open fur the purposes for which they were designed and built, i. e., to afford the public a safe means of travel. Fankhauser v. Mansfield…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Davis v. Charles Shutrump & Sons Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Yackee v. Village of NapoleonOhio Supreme Court · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ruwe v. Board of Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dickerhoof v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Mitchell v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Williamson v. PavlovichOhio Supreme Court · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API