Legal Opinion
State v. Montanez
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 25, 2014No. AC35264PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL, J.
The defendant, Ricardo Montanez, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to revise a judgment mittimus. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court erred in finding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The facts and procedural history are not in dispute. The defendant was charged with the sale of a narcotic substance in violation of General Statutes § 21a-277 (a) (drug case). In July, 1986, the defendant pleaded guilty to that charge. He posted bond and, as a result, he was not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. McNellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AndersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. RiddickConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. NusserConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020