Legal Opinion

State v. Simkins

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 11, 2014No. C110391CR; A152269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

After defendant was convicted of two counts of first-degree theft and two counts of first-degree criminal mistreatment, the trial court ordered defendant to pay an “offense surcharge” of $35 for each conviction, pursuant to Oregon Laws 2009, chapter 659, section 2. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court plainly erred in imposing that surcharge because his crimes were committed outside the period of time covered by the authorizing statute. See Or Laws 2009, ch 659, § 2(3) (providing that “[t]he offense surcharge required by this section shall be imposed only for offenses that are…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental QualityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  3. State v. SasserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. State v. GammonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API