Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Noble

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1943No. 22759Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

Appellant insists that we were in error in dismissing the appeal.

In support of the proposition that no appeal will lie from an order refusing to issue a writ of habeas corpus we cite the following in addition to the authorities referred to in our original opinion: See cases listed in Section 243, Branch's Ann. Tex. P. C., p. 152, and particularly Ex parte Thomas,61 Tex. Crim. 573; Ex parte Barnett, 74 Tex.Crim. R.,167 S.W. 845; also 21. Tex. Jur. p. 483, sec. 57.

In relator's motion for rehearing he adverts to the Smith case referred to in our original opinion as not supporting our conclusion.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte BarnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Ex Parte ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API