Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Barnett

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 3, 1914No. 3163PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HABPEB, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the prohibition law on a trial held in the District Court of Grayson County. A motion for new trial was overruled, and notice of appeal given. Subsequent thereto and after the adjournment of court, relator applied to Judge Peck for a writ of habeas corpus, who set the application down for hearing as to whether or not he would grant the writ. Upon the hearing he refused to grant the writ. Upon such state of facts no appeal lies to this court. (Magee v. State, 44 Texas Crim. Rep., 384.) An other reason why this case must be dismissed is that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sloan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Ex Parte MageeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  2. Ex parte HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Ex Parte Mary SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Ex Parte NobleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Ex Parte RenierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API