Rossitto v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WOLCOTT, Chief Justice:
This is an appeal from a conviction under 11 Del.C., § 669, of bookmaking upon horse races. Three questions are raised: (1) that the search warrant under which the person and premises of the appellant were searched and evidence seized, was illegal in that it failed to show probable cause; (2) that no competent evidence was offered by the State to prove that the appellant was concerned in bookmaking; and (3) that the trial court permitted prejudicial and in competent testimony to be given in the presence of the jury. We take the three questions up in the order stated.
Vali…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. FiorelloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Mezzatesta v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
3Cited by10 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dorsey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Jensen v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Marvel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.