Native American Church of Navajoland, Inc. v. Arizona Corporation Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
1Dissent
Mr. Justice Douglas, with whom Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Rehnquist join,
dissenting.
This is a direct appeal from the order of a three-judge District Court, convened pursuant to 28 U. S. C. § 2281,1 denying appellants’ prayer for injunctive relief. Jurisdiction over the appeal is based upon 28 U. S. C. § 1253.2 If the three-judge court were improperly convened, however, the appeal lies not to this Court, but to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97. My anal*902ysis leads me to conclude that a three-judge court was not required, so I would dismiss this appeal.
The controversy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Moody v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ex Parte BransfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Wilentz v. Sovereign Camp, Woodman of the WorldSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.