Jackson v. Menter Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. December 6, 1916. The action was by the Menter Company against R. R. Jackson Jr., in the municipal court of Atlanta.
Read the full summary
Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Pendleton. December 6, 1916. The action was by the Menter Company against R. R. Jackson Jr., in the municipal court of Atlanta. In what is referred to “as a copy of the cause of action attached to the process” the name and address of the plaintiff and the words, “Clothing for men, women, and children,” are .followed by these items: 6/10/16 L suit $18.00 6/10/16 Cash $1.00 ” ” 2.00 6/17/16 ” 1.00 6/27/16 ” • 1.00. Bal. $13.00 $18.00 The items are followed by the name of the defendant. The grounds of the demurrer were: “The alleged cause of action…
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
The judge of the superior court should have sustained the certiorari, because (a) the general demurrer to the cause of action should have been sustained; (6) the evidence demanded a verdict in.favor of the defendant in the trial court. Mayer v. Southern Express Co., 17 Ga. App. 744 (88 S. E. 403).
Judgment reversed.
Wade, C. J., and George, J., conewr. Gober & Jackson, for plaintiff in error.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mayer v. Southern Express Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Culverhouse v. Atlanta Ass'n for Convalescent Aged Persons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Walker v. Industrial Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Southern Railway Co. v. GrizzleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Culverhouse v. Atlanta Ass'n for Convalescent Aged Persons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972