Legal Opinion

Planned Protective Services, Inc. v. Gorton

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 6, 1988No. Docket Nos. D005028, D004354PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTLER, J. *

Susan Golding and Jamie Brierton were candidates for election to the San Diego City Council. Golding won and Brierton sued her and George Gorton, a campaign helper, for conspiracy and libel arising out of the last-minute mailing to the electorate of a four-page brochure including a page reciting allegations of “violations of trust” and “improprieties” based on conservatorship proceedings involving Brierton. The court granted Golding’s and Gorton’s motions for summary judgment, dismissed the complaint and awarded attorney fees to Golding. Brierton appeals. We affirm…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Casso v. BrandTexas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Children's Hospital & Medical Center v. BontaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. North Coast Business Park v. Nielsen Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API