Legal Opinion

Page Mach. Co. v. Dow

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided April 3, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

HAZEL, District Judge.

This action is brought to enjoin infringement by the defendant of letters patent No. 558,506, dated April 81, 1896, issued to Benjamin E. Merritt and John M. Joy, for printing-telegraph, No. 780,664, dated January ,84, 1905, to John M. Joy, for printing-telegraph receiver, and No. 786,294, dated April 4, 1905, to John M. Joy, for clutch mechanism. These improvement patents are embodied in printing-telegraph machines known as page-tickers, which *474are chiefty used in broker’s offices and banks, and electrically record on sheets of paper news items relating to stock…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. George Frost Co. v. CohnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
  4. Edison v. American Mutoscope & Biograph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  5. Goodyear Shoe Mach. Co. v. SpauldingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Page Mach. Co. v. DowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
  2. Page Mach. Co. v. Dow, Jones & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
  3. Page Mach. Co. v. Dow, Jones & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API