Sjolander v. City of Houston
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENSON, Justice.
This is an action for damages to a leasehold interest held by plaintiff, John W. Sjolander. The City of Houston is defendant, and inverse condemnation is the nature of the cause of action. Trial was before the court, and judgment was rendered that plaintiff take nothing.
The findings of fact made by the trial court succinctly state the factual situation which existed. The findings which plaintiff agrees are correctly stated, in substance, as follows: In 1969 and prior years, plaintiff was a rice farmer and held a leasehold interest in the property involved in this suit.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- State v. CarpenterTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Griggs v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- City of Lagrange v. PierattTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Dallas v. PrioloTexas Supreme Court · 1951
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Bridges v. Trinity River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- City of Austin v. Travis County Landfill Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- City of Austin/Travis County Landfill Company, L.L.C. v. Travis County Landfill Company, L.L.C./City of Austin, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999