Legal Opinion

Janeczko v. Duhl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 16, 1990PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, *258Supreme Court, New York County (David H. Edwards, Jr., J.), entered on or about January 10, 1990, inter alia, granting motion and cross motion of the defendants for dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a cause of action (CPLR 3211 [a] [7]) and entering judgment accordingly, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion and cross motion denied, the judgment vacated, the complaint reinstated, and plaintiffs granted leave to amend their complaint to plead a cause of action pursuant to General Municipal Law § 205-e, without costs.

This appeal requires us to examine whether under…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Santangelo v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Kenavan v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Starkey v. Trancamp Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Pascarella v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Guadagno v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cooper v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Villanueva v. ComparettoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Maisch v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Ruotolo v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Addolorato v. Safeguard Chemical Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API