Legal Opinion

State v. Ortiz

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 27, 2002No. AC 21636PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The defendant, Oswaldo Ortiz, Jr., appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (4), robbery of an occupied motor vehicle in violation of General Statutes § 53a-136a and robbery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-135 (a) (1). We conclude that it was plain error for the court to fail to instruct the jury on the affirmative defense of inoperability of the gun involved in the incident at issue, as provided for in the text of § 53a-134 (a) (4)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. MontoyaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. HaywoodConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. State v. FelderConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. State v. JeffersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API