Legal Opinion
Linscott v. Foy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 11, 1998PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SAUFLEY, Justice.
[¶ 1] This is James Foy’s fourth appeal to this Court in connection with the litigation between him, Craig Linscott, and their related corporations, SMA Insurance Agency, Inc. and Berwick Insurance, Inc. Foy appeals from two post-judgment orders entered in the Superior Court (York County, Perkins, A.R.J.) in favor of Craig Linscott, contending, inter alia, that the court exceeded the bounds of its discretion when it enforced an order of specific performance and imposed sanctions on Foy. We find no error in the order of enforcement or the imposition of certain sanctions.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gibson v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Michaud v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. v. T. Buck Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Eaton v. Town of WellsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Jenkins, Inc. v. Walsh Bros., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
- Matrix Properties Corp. v. TAG INVESTMENTSNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sebra v. WentworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Baker v. ManterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.