Legal Opinion
Dunham v. Special School District No. 1
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1992No. CX-91-1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Marian C. Dunham appeals from summary judgment granted in favor of respondent Special School District No. 1. The trial court entered summary judgment dismissing Dunham’s actions under the Minnesota Human Rights Act and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Dunham alleges that the school district racially discriminated against her in its hiring practices in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. Dunham initially filed a charge of discrimination by the school district with the Commissioner of the Minnesota…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Ryan v. ITT Life Insurance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Special School District No. 1 v. DunhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993