Legal Opinion

Estate of Crossmore v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 12, 1988No. Docket No. 25910-87UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

When decedent died she owned an interest in the estate of another arising under a will not probated at the valuation date. Held, the date-of-death fair market value of decedent's interest was $ 270,179 after discount for the nuisance value of the anticipated claim of undue influence against the will giving rise to that interest. Sec. 2031(a).

1Opinion of the Court

ESTATE OF VIRGINIA W. CROSSMORE, DECEASED, EDWARD Y. CROSSMORE, EXECUTOR, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Estate of Crossmore v. Commissioner

Docket No. 25910-87.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1988-494; 1988 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 516; 56 T.C.M. (CCH) 483; T.C.M. (RIA) 88494;

October 12, 1988.

When decedent died she owned an interest in the estate of another arising under a will not probated at the valuation date. Held, the date-of-death fair market value of decedent's interest was $ 270,179 after discount for the nuisance value of the anticipated claim of undue influence…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  5. Salen v. United States Lines Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership, Dynamo, GP, Inc., Tax Matters Partner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API