Sharp v. Northwestern National Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
In this workers’ compensation case, we are asked to review the Chancery Court’s denial of benefits to the Plaintiff. The facts were not in dispute at the trial level, and no evidence was introduced other than the Plaintiff’s deposition. The Plaintiff, Aaron Sharp, is employed by Pinkerton’s, Inc., as a “roving sergeant,” which means he is subject to being called to work at any time. His supervisor calls him by telephone at home to tell him when and where to report for work. The Plaintiff is paid only for the hours he actually works at the job site, not for the time he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central Surety & Insurance v. Mrs. Cora Trawick CourtTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Employers' Liability Assur. Corp. v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
- Woods v. WarrenTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Howard v. Cornerstone Medical Associates, P.C.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
- Choate v. Athens Manufacturing CorporationTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Dugger, Paula v. Home Health Care of Middle TNTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016
- Dugger, Paula v. Home Health Care of Middle TNTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · 2016
- Gleaves v. Checker Cab Transit & MosleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.