Legal Opinion

Cooperstein v. Williams

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah

Decided December 6, 2024No. 23-02102Unknown

1Opinion

This order is SIGNED. Si a □□ Dated: December 6, 2024 “DP / [har ke | Gane □□ □ U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Nin «SS IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION In re: Bankruptcy Case No. 23-23245 HEIDI WILLIAMS, Chapter 7 Debtor. IAN J. COOPERSTEIN, Plaintiff, Adversary Proceeding No. 23-2102 Vv. Judge Joel T. Marker HEIDI WILLIAMS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM DECISION As an area of federal law, bankruptcy is both unusual and highly consequential. By permitting qualified debtors to discharge their financial obligations, it upends normal contract expectations, which has…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Husky International Electronics, Inc. v. RitzSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Lamar, Archer & Cofrin, LLP v. ApplingSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  3. Johnson v. Riebesell (In Re Riebesell)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. Cordell v. Sturgeon (In re Sturgeon)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2013
  5. Stephen Thompson v. United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of OklahomaBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API