Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 15, 1995No. S94G1143Published

1Opinion of the Court

265 Ga. 171 (1995)

ESPINOZA

v.

THE STATE.

S94G1143.

Supreme Court of Georgia.

Decided March 15, 1995.

Steve T. Woodman, for appellant.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Nancy I. Jordan, William M. Clark, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee.

FLETCHER, Justice.

We granted the writ of certiorari to consider whether the Court of Appeals properly applied the concept of curtilage. We disapprove of the term "common area curtilage," on which the Court of Appeals relied, and reverse on the ground that police officers discovered the evidence within the curtilage of the defendant's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API