Rook v. James E. Russell Petroleum, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Parks, J.:
Plaintiffs Maxine and John Rook filed this action seeking partial cancellation of oil and gas leases held by defendant James E. Russell Petroleum, Inc. The trial court held that the leases were still in effect but that the defendant’s 17-year suspension of production constituted abandonment of the oil and gas production rights. It further held that the reservation of the right to store gas on the property, held by the sublessee, Cities Service Gas Company, remained in effect. Defendant appeals.
James Russell purchased the leases in question in 1963 from W. S. Fees and subsequently…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Renner v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Cowman v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Mills v. HartzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Rush v. King Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Rawlings v. ArmelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rook v. James E. Russell Petroleum, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984