Legal Opinion

Wing On Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 9, 1952No. 56967; protests 172028-K, etc. (New York and Boston)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These protests, all of which were consolidated by consent of the parties, relate to certain carved figures and other articles composed of synthetic resin, covered by protest 172028-K, and represented by the invoice items marked “A” and checked either “JS” or “WAMcD,” in the other consolidated protests, which were assessed with duty at 50 per centum ad valorem plus 40 cents per pound under paragraph 33 of the Tariff Act of 1930 by similitude to galalith. Plaintiffs claim that the merchandise in question is dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Protests 58030-K of Fan Co.United States Customs Court · 1944
  2. Protest 975383-G of American Express Co.United States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Wenchow Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  4. China Overseas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Wing On Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Maher-App & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API