Legal Opinion

(SS) Kincade v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 25, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01508Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH LEERAY KINCADE, No. 2:24-cv-01508-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”), denying his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”) under 20 Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381

-1383f. Plaintiff argues that 21 the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) failed to consider his inability…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API