Legal Opinion
Murphy Exploration & Production Company v. Oryx Energy Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 22, 1996No. 96-1108PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
Murphy Exploration & Production Company (Murphy 1 ) seeks reimbursement from Oryx Energy Company (Oryx 2 ) of certain sums that Murphy paid the Department of Energy (DOE) in settlement of litigation concerning violation of the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970 (ESA), 12 U.S.C. § 1904 note, incorporated in the Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act (EPAA), 15 U.S.C. § 754(a)(1). Murphy states that it was required to make restitution to the DOE for overcharges that in fact were charged and received by Oryx as owner of working interests in oil leases operated by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Exxon Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
- Conoco Inc. (Formerly Continental Oil Co.) v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Westlands Water DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Mobil Producing Texas & New Mexico, and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Westlands Water District v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Riviera Finance of Texas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Conoco Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.