Legal Opinion

Bosch v. Damm

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1941No. Docket No. 129, Calendar No. 41,360PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

This is an appeal by defendant Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury in the sum of $1,300, a dismissal having been granted as against defendant Damm. Plaintiff Standard Insurance Company of New York is interested to the extent of $1,000 paid on the fire loss of plaintiff Bosch.

On June 25, 1937, Bosch purchased a new Westinghouse refrigerator from Damm, an authorized dealer in Westinghouse products. The refrigerator was installed by Damm in the kitchen of the Bosch home about four or five inches from the wall. Westinghouse’s written…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Russ v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  3. MacRes v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  4. People v. BowenMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In Re Lembrich's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Spence v. Three Rivers Builders & Masonry Supply, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Grewe v. Mount Clemens General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ryan v. Zweck-Wollenberg Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. FlenonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Durbin v. K-K-M Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API