Legal Opinion

Farmers & Merchants Ins. v. Nixon

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Yuma County.

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

Appellant insured a building used as a hotel, the policy running to appellee. The property was destroyed by fire. Suit was brought tó recover the insurance; trial had to a jury; verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $200 and interest; judgment on the verdict. There was no question in regard to the origin of the fire. An open vessel of gasoline for replenishing the fire was brought in by a servant; it took fire and the building was consumed.

The defense was based upon the fact that a gasoline stove was used in the building for cooking ; that by the terms of the policy the use of gasoline was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pitney v. . Glen's Falls Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Joliffe v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Provident Life Insurance v. FennellIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Higgins v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  5. Gilpin v. GilpinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. German Insurance v. ShaderNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Merchants' Mutual Fire Insurance v. HarrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
  4. Great American Insurance v. ScottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  5. Western Nat. Ins. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API