Legal Opinion

Western Nat. Ins. v. Marsh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 9, 1912No. 1766Published

Error from District Court, Okmulgee County; W.-L. Barnum, Judge. Action by Henry A. Marsh against the Western National Insurance Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

AMES, C.

The policy sued on contains this provision:

“This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy.”

Also the following:

“This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions, together with such other provisions, agreements, or conditions, as may be indorsed hereon or added hereto, and no officer, agent, or other representative…

2Cases cited117 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Morrison v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Johnson v. Ætna InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API