Legal Opinion
Wilstach v. Heyd
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 1890No. 14,053PublishedCited by 8 opinions
From the Floyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.
This is an action for damages for the alleged breach of a contract for the sale of a lot.
The only error assigned is sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.
The appellant brings the action as plaintiff against George Heyd, Jacob Heyd, Emma Sharp, John Sharp, Sarah J. *575Venable, Laura C. Chamberlain and Charles H. Chamberlain as defendants.
The amended complaint is as follows :
“ The plaintiff, by way of amended complaint, complains ■of the defendants, and says that, on the 23d day of April, 1887, in consideration of the sum of $2,560, to be paid by the plaintiff to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Lee v. HillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Ridgway v. IngramIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by8 opinions
- Broadway Hospital & Sanitarium v. DeckerWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. WannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Maris v. MastersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Carskaddon v. City of South BendIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Peoria Grape Sugar Co. v. Babcock Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.