Legal Opinion

Adibi v. California State Board of Pharmacy

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 7, 2005No. C-05-0605 EMCPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docket No. 8)

CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiffs Afshin Adibi and International Pharmaceutical Services (“IPS”) have filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants the California State Board of Pharmacy (“Board”) and its executive director Patricia Harris in her official capacity. Plaintiffs seek (1) a declaration that Defendants have violated the Dormant Commerce Clause by trying to revoke or suspend Plaintiffs’ pharmaceutical license and permit and (2) an injunction barring Defendants from revoking or suspending the same.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ramirez v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2005
  2. Elizabeth Curry White v. Jonathan E. KareshDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026
  3. UnitedHealthcare of the Rockies, Inc. v. CameronDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026
  4. Witzke v. Idaho State Bar, Board of Commissioners of theDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API