Legal Opinion
State v. Hollandsworth
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 27, 1983No. 77 716 L, 77 731 L; CA No. A26169PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
Defendant appeals a conviction for driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. ORS 487.540. He contends that it was error to deny his motion to dismiss on the basis of collateral estoppel. ORS 43.160.1
A single indictment charged defendant with two counts of felony driving while suspended (DWS), ORS 487.560, and one count of driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). The three crimes were alleged to have occurred in the same act or transaction. Over the state’s objection, the trial court granted defendant’s motion to sever for trial the two counts of driving while…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. BoydOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. FitzgeraldOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- University of Nevada v. TarkanianNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984