Legal Opinion

Kinney v. Foust

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1923No. 6 Div. 105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.

This is an action of detinue for the recovery of a mule/ Girley & Son executed and delivered to Goddard Bros., Copeland & Head a note and chattel mortgage to secure an indebtedness of $750/ This paper was dated March 30, 1920, and due October 1, 1920, and described and included one black mare mule, the subject of this suit. On or about May 1, 1920, the plaintiff paid ,to Goddard’ Bros., Copeland & Head “value for the mortgage,” and the note and mortgage was delivered to plaintiff “with the in-dorsements thereon.” The note and mortgage; being a promise to pay and a conveyance of personal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phillips v. SellersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868
  2. Sanders v. RogersAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sims v. United Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API