Legal Opinion

Sims v. United Auto Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 14, 1930No. 4 Div. 504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

The plaintiff, appellee, • in an action of detinue for crops and other personalty, relied upon a mortgage executed by appellant to one A. C. Bryan, and indorsed in blank by him and delivered to plaintiff as collateral security for his debt- to it. The mortgage was in a short form, covering crops and stock, and the note was a part of the mortgage. The alleged assignment was a mere indorsement.

The sufficiency of the indorsement in blank of a chattel mortgage to justify such an action as this has been before the Supreme and appellate courts with more or less directness.

The assignment by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Jones v. ReeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Strong v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Windham & Co. v. Stephenson & AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Graham v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  2. Kelley v. CasselsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  3. Abernathy v. WorthySupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  4. First Nat. Bank of Union Springs v. RatleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API