Legal Opinion

Sturtevant v. Ouellette

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 7, 1928PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.

The plaintiff’s intestate, Arthur H. Sturtevant, while crossing Elm Street in the city of Waterville on the evening of October 23, 1925, was struck by the defendant’s automobile and died without conscious suffering. This action is brought to recover damages under R. S., Chap. 92, Sec. 9.

The case is before this Court on exceptions to the order of the presiding Justice directing a verdict for the defendant. It is the duty of the Court, therefore, simply to determine whether upon the evidence the jury could properly have found for the plaintiff. “If there was evidence which the jury were…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whaley v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Gosselin v. CollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. McCullough v. LalumiereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  4. Bechard v. LakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  5. Goudreau v. OueletteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API