Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Vigilant Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 17, 1986No. Docket 86186PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals as of right from a June 27, 1985, opinion and order entered by the Kalamazoo Circuit Court granting summary disposition in favor of defendant. The trial court found that plaintiff, as an assignee of Elvictor Taylor, was not entitled to personal injury protection coverage under a homeowner’s policy of insurance issued by defendant to the parents of Elvictor Taylor. The policy in question extends coverage to the named insureds and to "residents of the named insureds’ household.” The trial court found that Elvictor was not an insured under the homeowner’s policy. We agree and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Michigan Mutual Insurance v. SunstrumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Pauley v. HallMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Montgomery v. Hawkeye Security InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Stadelmann v. Glen Falls InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Parrish v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gibson v. CallaghanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  2. Hawkeye-Security Insurance v. Vector Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Allstate Insurance v. TomaszewskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. MooreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. First Mercury Syndicate, Inc. v. Telephone Alarm Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API