Legal Opinion

Chestnut v. Security Mutual Life Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1921PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Carroll County. — Hon. Ralph Hughes, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.

— This is a suit to recover premiums paid on a life insurance policy on account of alleged wrongful cancellation of the policy and forfeiture of premiums by defendant.

On December 2, 1891, plaintiff Theophilus H. Chestnut, made written application for a policy of insurance to the defendant company (then the Security Mutual Life Association but since changed to the Security Mutual Life Insurance Company), in which application and policy issued Mary T. Chestnut, wife of Theoph, H., was (later) the sole beneficiary. The said application was referred to the home office of the company at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMaster v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Halsey v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American Central Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Olson v. American Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  3. Landrigan v. Missouri State Life InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Liberty National Life Insurance Company, Inc. v. Betty S. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
  5. Life & Casualty Insurance Company v. VertreesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API