Legal Opinion
California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 16, 1946PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
This action for unfair competition was commenced December 4, 1945, by seventy-six named plaintiffs, manufacturers of various types of men’s, women’s and children’s wearing apparel and accessories, and all having their place of business in the State of California, against three named defendants, viz., Wieder of California, Inc., California Sportswear, Inc., and the Cortley Shirt Company, Inc. (the last labeling some of its articles “Californian Sportswear”), manufacturers of wearing apparel and having their place of business in New York. The first named plaintiff…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Engl v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Columbia Mill Co. v. AlcornSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Newton v. MoffieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
- Stuart Inv. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1951
- Foti Fuels, Inc. v. Kurrle Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Wyoming National Bank of Casper v. Security Bank & Trust Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Foti Fuels, Inc. and Robert A. Foti v. Kurrle Corporation, Payjack, LLC and James J. KurrleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.