Meinert v. Bottcher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants Charles Bottcher and wife from a judgment of the district court for Houston county, Whytock, J., dismissing an .action to foreclose the mortgage mentioned in the opinion. The .answer prayed for the cancellation of the bond and mortgage.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The only question presented by the record is whether the judgment is supported by the findings of fact. Briefly stated, these facts, so far as here material, are as follows: In March, 1876, the plaintiff conveyed to defendant, with full covenants •of title, 120 acres of land. The consideration for this deed was the covenant or agreement of defendant to erect a house on the premises for plaintiff’s occupancy, and to pay and furnish to him annually, during his natural life, certain specified amounts of money, supplies, .and provisions for his support. On the same day, and as part of the ■same…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- C. Aultman & Co. v. TorreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Ahl v. AhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
3Cited by2 opinions
- Francisco v. FranciscoMontana Supreme Court · 1947
- Peeler v. . PeelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932