In re Divine Ripe, L.L.C.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION SUSTAINING FRESCOS TOMVER, S.A. DE C.V.’S OBJECTION TO DISCLOSURE STATEMENT AND DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO APPOINT SAUL ZUNIGA AS DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF DIVINE RIPE, L.L.C. PURSUANT TO FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 9001(5)(A)
[Resolving ECF Nos. 68 and 105]
Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Pending before this Court are two motions. The first motion, filed by Frescos Tomver, S.A. DE C.V. (“Frescos Tom-ver ”), an unsecured creditor, is self-styled as “Objection to Disclosure Statement,” [ECF No. 105] (the “Objection ”), which alleges that the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Oneida Motor Freight, Inc. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. 203 North LaSalle Street PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In The Matter Of Sun Country Development, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Cambridge Analytica LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- In re SierraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- In re McPhilamyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017