Legal Opinion
Williford v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1983No. 5986PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
Terry Williford was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. AS 28.35.030(a).1 Her conviction was affirmed by the court of appeals in Williford v. State, 653 P.2d 339 (Alaska App.1982). We granted Williford’s petition for hearing to review her assertion that AS 28.35.030(a)(3) violates the due process clauses of the United States and Alaska Constitutions because it fails to give adequate notice of the conduct that is prohibited.
AS 28.35.030(a)(3) proscribes driving “while ... under the combined influence of intoxicating liquor and another substance.”…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Isakson v. RickeyAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Cox v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Linne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1983
- Valentine v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.