Bingham & Taylor, Division, Virginia Industries, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARMAN, Judge:
In this countervailing duty action plaintiffs contest the preliminary determination of the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) that there is no reasonable indication the domestic light iron construction eastings industry is materially injured or threatened with material injury by reason of subsidized imports from Brazil. Iron Construction Castings from Brazil, Canada, India, and the People’s Republic of China, 50 Fed.Reg. 27, 498 (1985). Defendant opposes plaintiffs’ Rule 56.1 motion for judgment upon the agency record, contending that the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Lamb Company v. The United States, and New Zealand Meat Products Board, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- City Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- USX Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- British Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Bingham & Taylor Division, Virginia Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Fundicao Tupy S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.