Legal Opinion
British Steel Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 31, 1986No. 83-7-01032PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
Introduction
The central issue presented, having significant international trade implications for foreign governments that make “equity infusions” in state-owned enterprises in poor financial health, is: Under what circumstances are such companies “uncreditworthy” thereby making the government’s investments commercially unreasonable and hence countervailable subsidies under 19 U.S.C. § 1677(5)(B)(i). On this vital aspect of the case, the present opinion is a sequel to the court’s previous decision, British Steel Corporation v. United States, 9 CIT —, 605 F.Supp. 286…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. Dimension Financial Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- British Steel PLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
- Al Tech Specialty Steel Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
- Ipsco, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.