Legal Opinion
SCAC Transport (USA) Inc. v. S.S. "Danaos"
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 20, 1984No. 78 Civ. 6176(JFK)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEENAN, District Judge:
FACTS
On December 23, 1977, during the loading of the vessel S.S. Dañaos at Port Newark, New Jersey, a truck and the lift on which it was suspended were damaged when a pin in a winch block failed, causing the truck to fall from the lift. The owners of the truck, SCAC Transport (USA), Inc. and the United Nations Development Pro-gramme Office for Projects Execution, brought suit for damages to the truck against the vessel, the charterers of the vessel, Big Lift USA, Inc. and Big Lift Shipping (N.A.) Inc. and the owner of the vessel, Danais…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of Israel, Sperry International Trade, Inc. v. Government of IsraelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Cheryl Coudert v. Paine Webber Jackson & CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- SCAC Transport (USA) Inc. v. S.S. DanaosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Celotex Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. $100 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Scac Transport (Usa) Inc. And United Nations Development Programme Office for Projects Execution v. S.S. "Danaos," Her Engines, Boilers, Etc., and Big Lift Usa, Inc., Big Lift Shipping Company (n.a.) Inc. D/B/A Big Lift and Danais Shipping Company, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees, Danais Shipping Company, Third-Party v. Universal Maritime Service Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988