Legal Opinion

Riggs v. Commonwealth, Department of Transpontation

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1980No. Appeal, No. 1764 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Raymond Riggs, Jr., Patrick H. O’Connor, John Kubinsky, and J. A. Hayes (Petitioners) have filed this appeal from an order of the Board of Claims dismissing Petitioners’ claim against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (DOT).

Petitioners are employed by DOT as auto mechanics. As a condition of employment, each mechanic is required to maintain a full and complete set of mechanic’s tools. These tools are very heavy and are stored at the garage, in individual locked boxes, after working hours and on weekends. On October 7, 1978, the garage was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Northwest'n Nat. Bk. v. Com'nw'lth.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Northwestern National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Commonwealth, General State Authority v. LoffredoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. JerrytoneCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API