Legal Opinion
Riggs v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 9, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1240 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Doyle,
Petitioners appeal an order of the Board of Claims (Board) which denied petitioners ’ claim against their employer, the Department of Transportation (DOT), for the value of work tools stolen from a DOT garage. We affirm..
Petitioners are mechanics for DOT and are stationed at the Christy Park garage, McKeesport, Pennsylvania.1 As a condition of their employment, they were each required to supply their own set of work *229tools, which, for their own convenience, they stored at the garage in their own locked cabinets. Sometime during the weekend of October 7, 1978, an unknown…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sparrow v. Airport Parking Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. E. J. Albrecht Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Riggs v. Commonwealth, Department of TranspontationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Charlie, A. v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Lear, Inc. v. EddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Windsor Communications Group, Inc. v. Metropolitan Consolidated Industries, Inc. (In Re Windsor Communications Group, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
- Al Makaaseb General Trading Co. v. United States Steel International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2006
- Torres v. KallooSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.