Legal Opinion
Kasper v. O'Connell
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 11, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam Lyman, J.
Petitioner, a licensed auctioneer, seeks in this proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review respondent Commissioner of Licenses’ determination which, after a hearing, found the petitioner herein guilty of violating rule 11 of the Bules and Regulations of the Department of Licenses relating to auctioneers and imposed a fine of $25.
The charges against petitioner arose from an auction sale to the public of certain goods, wares and merchandise, which sale was advertised as a “ Creditors’ Committee Sale.” No license to conduct the afore-mentioned sale was obtained by the said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Peters v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Morrill v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Matter of Hines v. La GuardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kendall v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Auer v. DysonNew York Supreme Court · 1981
- Tuchman v. TrussellNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- State Land Department v. Painted Desert Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Pooler v. Public Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.