Legal Opinion

Rzepka v. Michael

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1988No. Docket 93044PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. P. Borrello, J,

Plaintiff claims an appeal from a directed verdict of no cause of action as to individual defendants Sadler and Mallams following plaintiffs proofs. We affirm.

In addition to the judgment appealed from, a judgment was entered against defendant Opportunities News Corporation for $16,187.50. On May 23, 1986, an order was entered denying plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of a consent judgment dated March 3, 1986. The consent judgment was against defendant Personnel Recruiters Corporation International for $147,580 and against defendant Thompson for $163,767.50.

Defendants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Melia v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Howell v. Vito's Trucking and Excavating Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Luttrell v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Rittenhouse v. ErhartMichigan Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. King v. PopeTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Limbach v. Oakland County Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Felsner v. McDonald Rent-A-Car, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Shaw v. Shaw (In Re Shaw)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Noyd v. Claxton, Morgan, Flockhart & VanLiereMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API