Legal Opinion
Halley Optical Corp. v. Jagar International Marketing Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 18, 1990No. 90 Civ. 6156 (DNE)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Petitioner Halley moves to confirm an arbitration award dated July 17, 1990, for interest, and for costs. Respondent De-Grandpre cross-moves to vacate the same arbitration award. For reasons to be discussed, petitioner’s motion is granted.
I. Background
Petitioner Halley is a seller of optical equipment. Respondent Jagar is a marketing company. Respondent DeGrandpre is the president of Jagar. On February 15, 1983, Halley entered into an agreement with Jagar where Jagar would “use its best efforts to locate suppliers for the production, manufacturing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Marcy Smiga v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., and Raymond B. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States Steel And Carnegie Pension Fund v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Peters Fabrics, Inc. v. Jantzen, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
3Cited by10 opinions
- LAWRENCE STOREY, — v. CELLO HOLDINGS, L.L.C., CELLO MUSIC AND FILM SYSTEMS, INC., — HERRICK, FEINSTEIN LLP AND ODIN, FELDMAN & PITTLEMAN, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Europcar Italia, S.P.A. v. Maiellano Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- LGC Holdings, Inc. v. Julius Klein Diamonds, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Mays v. Lanier Worldwide, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
- Arbitration Between Halcot Navigation Limited Partnership and Stolt-Nielsen Transportation GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.