Asmussen v. Post Printing & Publishing Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Error to Denver District Court. Hqn. Hubert* L. Shat-tuck, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Hurlbut, J.,
rendered the opinion of the court.
This action was brought March 8, 1910, to recover a judgment against defendants (plaintiffs in error) in the sum of $1,141.19. The action was tried to a jury, which, under the instruction of the court, rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,044.67; upon which judgment was entered.
The action is based upon a written contract entered into between plaintiff, defendants, and one Frank F. Farrell, at Cripple Creek.
The contract between plaintiff and Farrell, and the guaranty contract between plaintiff and defendants, appear on one instrument. It…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Davis Sewing MacHine Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Bishop v. EatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Taussig v. ReidIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Craft v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1838
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. WhanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.