Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 31, 2008No. 89413Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kenneth A. Rocco, Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Diane Coleman, personally and on behalf of her minor son Brandon Coleman, and Enoch Al-Amin (collectively, “Coleman”) appeal from the trial court order that granted summary judgment to defendantappellee, the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“RTA”), on their complaint.

{¶ 2} Coleman argues in her two assignments of error that summary judgment in RTA’s favor was unwarranted on the record before the trial court. This court *737agrees. Consequently, Coleman’s assignments of error are sustained. The trial court’s order is reversed, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Martin v. Central Ohio Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API