Coleman v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kenneth A. Rocco, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Diane Coleman, personally and on behalf of her minor son Brandon Coleman, and Enoch Al-Amin (collectively, “Coleman”) appeal from the trial court order that granted summary judgment to defendantappellee, the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority (“RTA”), on their complaint.
{¶ 2} Coleman argues in her two assignments of error that summary judgment in RTA’s favor was unwarranted on the record before the trial court. This court *737agrees. Consequently, Coleman’s assignments of error are sustained. The trial court’s order is reversed, and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Martin v. Central Ohio Transit AuthorityOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.