Legal Opinion

Black v. W. S. Tyler Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 5, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga county.

1Opinion of the CourtLieghley, J.

The parties stood in the same order below.

*28The following facts may be said to be agreed upon or established by the pleadings and proof in the case:

That on July 1, 1914, the defendant promulgated in writing the following profit-sharing plan for the benefit of its employes:

“Cleveland, Ohio, July I, 1914.
“To Our Employees :
“This Company has decided to adopt a profit-sharing plan for the benefit of its employees,- beginning January 1st, 1915, and applying to the profits for the year, 1914, on the following basis:
“1st: There will be allowed 6% interest on the Capital Stock. After the above 6%…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zwolanek v. Baker Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bolling v. Clevepak Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Tindle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  3. Wellington v. Con P. Curran Printing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1925
  4. Parish & Bingham Corp. v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API