Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Hudson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 2014No. Appellate Case No. 2012-212690; No. 5217PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

In this divorce action, H. Eugene Hudson (Husband) appeals the family court’s equitable distribution award to Mary Lee Hudson (Wife). Husband argues the family court erred in the following rulings: (1) finding a prenuptial agreement (the Agreement) was unconscionable; (2) awarding an equitable interest in the increase in value of allegedly nonmarital property; (3) exercising jurisdiction over allegedly nonmarital property; (4) failing to make specific findings of fact; and (5) requiring Husband to pay a portion of Wife’s attorney’s fees. We reverse.

FACTS

The parties began dating in 1995 or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Futch v. McAllister Towing of Georgetown, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Hardee v. HardeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Slack v. SlackSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
  2. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015
  3. Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API